Abstract
Purpose - In medical applications, it is crucial to evaluate the geometric accuracy of Rapid Prototyping (RP) models. Current research on evaluating geometric accuracy has focused in identifying two or more specific anatomical landmarks on the original structure and the RP model, and comparing their corresponding linear distances. Such kind of accuracy metrics is ambiguous and may induce misrepresentations of the actual errors. We propose an alternative method and metrics to measure the accuracy of RP models.Design/methodology/approach - We propose an accuracy metric composed of two different approaches: (1) a global accuracy evaluation using volumetric intersection indexes calculated over segmented Computed Tomography scans of the original object and the RP model. (2) A local error metric that is computed from the surfaces of the original object and the RP model. This local error is rendered in a 3D surface using a color code, that allow differentiating regions where the model is overestimated, underestimated, or correctly estimated. Global and local error measurements are performed after rigid body registration, segmentation and triangulation.Findings - Our results show that our method can be applied to different objects without any modification, and provide simple, meaningful and precise quantitative indexes to measure the geometric accuracy of RP models.Originality/value - We present a new approach to characterize the geometric errors in RP models using global indexes and a local surface distribution of the errors. It requires a minimum human intervention and it can be applied without any modification to any kind of object.
Purpose - In medical applications, it is crucial to evaluate the geometric accuracy of Rapid Prototyping (RP) models. Current research on evaluating geometric accuracy has focused in identifying two or more specific anatomical landmarks on the original structure and the RP model, and comparing their corresponding linear distances. Such kind of accuracy metrics is ambiguous and may induce misrepresentations of the actual errors. We propose an alternative method and metrics to measure the accuracy of RP models.Design/methodology/approach - We propose an accuracy metric composed of two different approaches: (1) a global accuracy evaluation using volumetric intersection indexes calculated over segmented Computed Tomography scans of the original object and the RP model. (2) A local error metric that is computed from the surfaces of the original object and the RP model. This local error is rendered in a 3D surface using a color code, that allow differentiating regions where the model is overestimated, underestimated, or correctly estimated. Global and local error measurements are performed after rigid body registration, segmentation and triangulation.Findings - Our results show that our method can be applied to different objects without any modification, and provide simple, meaningful and precise quantitative indexes to measure the geometric accuracy of RP models.Originality/value - We present a new approach to characterize the geometric errors in RP models using global indexes and a local surface distribution of the errors. It requires a minimum human intervention and it can be applied without any modification to any kind of object.